Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Another Emergency Backup Posting

I've just posted this message over at a another forum, in the reasonable expectation that it will be removed I am reposting it here:

You know, I haven't seen this kind of shrieking and outright moral evasion since I suggested (on my own blog) that the advocates of Marxism be made to experience it from the victim's point of view, by one round in the head in the old Soviet style.

My present literary project is a science fiction novel depicting how a planet with a basically Objectivist culture would deal with the military problems facing it. In reference to one former enemy, the in-universe stand-ins for the Dorsai, I will have a character say: "Have you been to Xenophon lately? Nobody lives there. Not even mutants hunting each other for food."

Anyone, such as a Soviet Communist, a National Socialist, or an Islamist, who see me as either livestock to be enslaved, or as a diseased animal to be put down, is a mortal enemy, period. Such persons have surrendered all moral claims to the status of Humanity and all rights, including the right to live. Mr. Cline understands this.

On what grounds can someone claim to be Human when they stand up in defense of Islam, an ideology that denies my right to live as a rational human being and only permits my existence if I submit to the status of livestock?

My answer to those who denounce Ed Cline as inhuman is, no, he is not inhuman, you are.

Either you people need to pull your heads out of your terminal orifices or terminate yourselves.

The piece written by Edward Cline that I refer to may be found at

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

Update at 1700 CDT:

I've been permanently banned for bigotry and trolling.

I do acknowledge the fact that the owners of the site have the right to control the content of their site. But reality is what it is and covering one's eyes will not change that.

Friday, August 19, 2011

A Blast From The Past

I was going through some old links in my bookmarks file when I found the following comment I had left on someone else's blog. The blogger in question has unfortunately gone over the other side and thus has won himself a free Lubyanka lobotomy. At some point I would expect the blogger to eventually remove this comment from his blog. Thus I repost it here.

The ideology of Eugenics was in practical effect a rejection of the evolutionary process. (And as some may argue, a rejection of the actual will of God the Creator.)

Instead of allowing human life to develop over time in accordance to a natural process (of as some would argue, the way the Creator wanted it), the Eugenicists would instead assume the role of God in the process and personally direct the development of human life themselves. The Eugenicists would determine who may or may not procreate and pass on their genes to the next generation.

In practical effect the ideology of Eugenics reduced the legal and moral status of ordinary human beings to that of livestock. It was simply another pseudoscientific attempt to justify the recreation of a master-slave society, where in this case the Eugenicists would assume the role of ranchers who would breed human beings as if they were mere cattle.

The ideology of Eugenics was just another attempted excuse for the recreation of tyranny. But as they used to teach us at the Benning School for Boys, the maximum effective range of an excuse is zero.

What are your questions on this block of instruction?

And its been a while since I've posted something here.